Collusion in family systems theory
Introduction
In the formation of a dyadic relationship, each partner discovers in the other past and/or repressed parts of self. These aspects of self may be regarded as representations of needs and wishes repressed via defense mechanisms. A partner’s attraction is often based on the extent to which the partner is viewed as embodying the parts of self that have been repressed (Simon et al. 1985). Consequently, the concept of collusion in family systems theory is derived from projective identification.
Over the course of the relationship, what was viewed as initially attractive becomes an eventual source of conflict, and interpersonal strife emerges. Choosing a partner permits one the opportunity to complete one’s self, but also sets the stage for renewed conflicting wishes and needs (Simon et al. 1985). The new ways of relating to one another over time in the dyadic relationship are experienced as burdensome, and the partners become...
References
- Bagarozzi, D. A. (2011). A closer look at couple collusion: Protecting the self and preserving the system. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39(5), 390–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dicks, H. V. (1967). Marital tensions: Clinical studies toward a psychological theory of integration. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Klein, M. (1936). The psychoanalysis of children. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, B. F., Stierlin, H., & Wynne, L. C. (1985). The language of family therapy: A systemic vocabulary and sourcebook. New York: Family Process Press.Google Scholar
- Stewart, R. H., Peters, T. C., Marsh, S., & Peters, M. J. (1975). Family Process, 14, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Willi, J. (1982). Couples in collusion. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
- Willi, J. (1984). Dynamics of couple therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
No comments:
Post a Comment